研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

Asciminib与bosutinib在至少接受过两种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的慢性期慢性髓细胞白血病患者中的比较:ASCEMBL长期随访。

Asciminib vs bosutinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors: longer-term follow-up of ASCEMBL.

发表日期:2023 Jan 30
作者: Andreas Hochhaus, Delphine Réa, Carla Boquimpani, Yosuke Minami, Jorge E Cortes, Timothy P Hughes, Jane F Apperley, Elza Lomaia, Sergey Voloshin, Anna Turkina, Dong-Wook Kim, Andre Abdo, Laura Maria Fogliatto, Philipp le Coutre, Koji Sasaki, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Susanne Saussele, Mario Annunziata, Naeem Chaudhri, Lynette Chee, Valentin García-Gutiérrez, Shruti Kapoor, Alex Allepuz, Sara Quenet, Véronique Bédoucha, Michael J Mauro
来源: LEUKEMIA

摘要:

阿司米尼布是第一种特异性靶向ABL肌醇化袋(STAMP)的BCR-ABL1抑制剂,已获全球批准,用于治疗曾接受≥2种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗的慢性期费城染色体阳性慢性髓细胞白血病成人患者(CML-CP)。在ASCEMBL试验中,接受≥2种先前TKIs治疗的CML-CP患者被随机分配(按基线主要细胞遗传学反应[MCyR]分层)为阿司米尼布40mg每日两次或博舒替尼500mg每日一次。与先前发表的主要分析结果一致,在2.3年的中位随访后,阿司米尼布继续展现出卓越的疗效和更好的安全性和耐受性,优于博舒替尼。在96周时的主要分子反应(MMR)率(关键次要终点)为阿司米尼布37.6%,而博舒替尼为15.8%;考虑到基线MCyR后,两组之间的MMR率差异为21.7%(95% CI,10.53-32.95;双侧p = 0.001)。阿司米尼布出现的三级及以上不良事件(AEs)(56.4%与68.4%)和引起治疗中断的AEs(7.7%与26.3%)比博舒替尼少。相对于博舒替尼,阿司米尼布患者的治疗持续时间更长且继续获益,支持阿司米尼布作为曾接受≥2种TKIs治疗的CML-CP患者的标准治疗。©2023.作者。
Asciminib, the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), is approved worldwide for the treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In ASCEMBL, patients with CML-CP treated with ≥2 prior TKIs were randomized (stratified by baseline major cytogenetic response [MCyR]) 2:1 to asciminib 40 mg twice daily or bosutinib 500 mg once daily. Consistent with previously published primary analysis results, after a median follow-up of 2.3 years, asciminib continued to demonstrate superior efficacy and better safety and tolerability than bosutinib. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 (key secondary endpoint) was 37.6% with asciminib vs 15.8% with bosutinib; the MMR rate difference between the arms, after adjusting for baseline MCyR, was 21.7% (95% CI, 10.53-32.95; two-sided p = 0.001). Fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (56.4% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (7.7% vs 26.3%) occurred with asciminib than with bosutinib. A higher proportion of patients on asciminib than bosutinib remained on treatment and continued to derive benefit over time, supporting asciminib as a standard of care for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs.© 2023. The Author(s).