研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

首线免疫治疗对非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的生存期和颅内效果的影响。

Impact of first-line immunotherapy on survival and intracranial outcomes in a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases at diagnosis.

发表日期:2023 Aug 06
作者: Benoit Nigen, Thomas Goronflot, Guillaume Herbreteau, Laurent Mathiot, Christine Sagan, Judith Raimbourg, Jaafar Bennouna, François Thillays, Elvire Pons-Tostivint
来源: LUNG CANCER

摘要:

尽管脑转移瘤(BM)在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者(ns-NSCLC)的诊断中很常见,但它们在随机对照试验中大多被排除在外。本回顾性研究的目的是评估一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在这些患者中的实际疗效。本研究评估了首线ICI为基础的治疗与化疗(CT)在被诊断为BM且无可靶向改变的ns-NSCLC患者中的颅内和全身疗效,并进行比较。患者根据系统治疗分为CT组、ICI组和CT-ICI组。主要终点是总生存期(OS),使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox方法进行比较。次要终点是颅内无进展生存期(icPFS)。在2018年01月至2021年05月期间,纳入了118名患者(CT组52名、ICI组38名和CT-ICI组28名)。中位随访时间为30.0个月。CT组、ICI组和CT-ICI组的患者中分别有75.0%、68.4%和67.9%接受了颅内放疗(p=0.805)。校正后发现,ICI组和CT-ICI组与CT组相比,OS更好(HR=0.46,95%CI:0.23-0.89,和HR=0.52,95%CI:0.27-1.01,分别)。ICI组和CT-ICI组与CT组相比,颅内无进展的风险降低了54%(HR=0.46,95%CI:0.25-0.84)和59%(HR=0.41,95%CI:0.23-0.77)。立体定向放射外科与仅系统治疗相比,与颅内无进展生存期(icPFS)增加相关(HR=0.51,95%CI:0.29-0.92),而整脑放疗则未与其相关。真实生活中在诊断时患有BM的ns-NSCLC患者,一线使用ICI进行治疗与仅CT相比,显示出OS和icPFS的益处。应进行前瞻性评估系统治疗和局部治疗的理想类型和顺序。版权所有 © 2023 Elsevier B.V.。保留所有权利。
Although brain metastases (BM) at diagnosis are common in non-squamous NSCLC patients (ns-NSCLC), they have been mostly excluded from randomized trials. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate real-word outcomes of frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in these patients.Our study assess the intracranial and overall efficacy of first-line ICI-based therapy compared to chemotherapy (CT) in ns-NSCLC patients diagnosed with BM, showing no targetable alterations. Patients were divided according to systemic therapy: CT, ICI, or CT-ICI. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. Secondary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (icPFS).Between 01 and 2018 and 05-2021, 118 patients were included (52 CT, 38 ICI and 28 CT-ICI). Median follow-up was 30.0 months. Intracranial radiotherapy was delivered for 75.0%, 68.4% and 67.9% of patients for CT, ICI and CT-ICI groups (p = 0.805). After adjustment, ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a better OS compared to CT (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.89, and HR = 0.52, 95 %CI: 0.27-1.01, respectively). ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intracranial progression by 54% (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.25-0.84) and 59% (HR = 0.41, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.77) compared to CT. Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with an increased icPFS compared to systemic therapy alone (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.92), whereas whole-brain was not.Real-life ns-NSCLC patients with BM at diagnosis treated frontline with ICI presented OS and icPFS benefit compared to CT alone. A prospective assessment of the ideal type and sequence of systemic and local therapy should be conducted.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.