在以前接受抗EGFR抗体治疗的RAS野生型晚期结直肠癌患者中,尽管再发的可能性很高,但Ramucirumab加FOLFIRI方案作为二线治疗是安全且有效的:JACCRO CC-16。
Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with anti-EGFR antibody: JACCRO CC-16.
发表日期:2023 Sep 11
作者:
H Yasui, Y Okita, M Nakamura, T Sagawa, T Watanabe, K Kataoka, D Manaka, K Shiraishi, N Akazawa, T Okuno, T Shimura, M Shiozawa, Y Sunakawa, H Ota, M Kotaka, H Okuyama, M Takeuchi, W Ichikawa, M Fujii, A Tsuji
来源:
ESMO Open
摘要:
联合药物化疗和抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体被认为是RAS野生型和左侧转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线治疗方案,而二线治疗方案尚未确立。目前为数不多的研究在野生型RAS mCRC的一线抗EGFR抗体治疗后前瞻性评估了抗血管内皮生长因子抗体的二线治疗。这个非随机分组的二期临床试验调查了RAS野生型mCRC患者在一线抗EGFR抗体联合双重或三重方案治疗后接受二线拉莫西单抗(RAM)联合氟尿嘧啶、左旋、伊立替康(FOLFIRI)的临床结果。主要终点是6个月无进展生存率(PFS)。次要终点包括PFS、总生存率(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、早期肿瘤缩小率(ETS)和安全性。我们假设6个月PFS率的阈值为30%,预期的6个月PFS率为45%。如果6个月PFS率的90%置信区间(CI)的下限大于0.30,则认为治疗有效.本研究纳入了92名患者。86(95.6%)名患者的原发肿瘤位于左侧。20(22.0%)名患者曾接受三重方案加氨甲喋呤作为前期治疗。6个月PFS率为58.2%(90%CI 49.3%至66.2%),中位PFS为7.0个月(95%CI 5.7-7.6个月)。中位OS为23.6个月(95%CI 16.5-26.3个月)。83名可测量病变的患者中,ORR和ETS率分别为10.7%和16.9%。以前接受双重和三重方案治疗的患者的6个月PFS率相当;然而,双重方案的中位PFS时间较长(7.4 vs 6.4个月,P = 0.036)。我们的研究前瞻性地证实,对野生型RAS和左侧mCRC抗EGFR抗体一线治疗之后,RAM加FOLFIRI是有效的二线治疗。此外,先前接受三重方案治疗的患者的结果与之类似。版权所有©2023作者。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。
Chemotherapy in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody is considered a first-line treatment regimen for RAS wild-type and left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), whereas second-line treatment regimens have not yet been established. Few studies have prospectively evaluated second-line treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody after first-line anti-EGFR antibody therapy for RAS wild-type mCRC.This non-randomized phase II trial investigated the clinical outcomes of second-line ramucirumab (RAM) plus fluorouracil, levofolinate, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) after first-line anti-EGFR antibody in combination with doublet or triplet regimen in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), rate of early tumor shrinkage (ETS), and safety. We hypothesized a threshold 6-month PFS rate of 30% and an expected 6-month PFS rate of 45%. Treatment was considered effective if the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the 6-month PFS rate was >0.30.Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study. The primary tumor was located on the left side in 86 (95.6%) patients. Twenty (22.0%) patients had received triplet plus cetuximab as previous therapy. Six-month PFS rate was 58.2% (90% CI 49.3% to 66.2%) with a median PFS of 7.0 months (95% CI 5.7-7.6 months). Median OS was 23.6 months (95% CI 16.5-26.3 months). The ORR and ETS rate were 10.7% and 16.9%, respectively, in 83 patients with measurable lesions. The 6-month PFS rate was comparable between patients previously treated with doublet and triplet regimens; however, median PFS was longer for the doublet regimen (7.4 versus 6.4 months, P = 0.036).Our study demonstrated prospectively that RAM plus FOLFIRI is an effective second-line treatment after anti-EGFR antibody-containing first-line therapy in RAS wild-type and left-sided mCRC. Furthermore, the results were similar for patients who were previously treated with triplet regimen.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.