研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

布瓦西坦在现实世界中按合并症和病因分层的癫痫患者的有效性和耐受性:来自国际经验汇总分析的 12 个月亚组数据。

Effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam in patients with epilepsy stratified by comorbidities and etiology in the real world: 12-month subgroup data from the international EXPERIENCE pooled analysis.

发表日期:2024 Mar 04
作者: Jerzy P Szaflarski, Hervé Besson, Wendyl D'Souza, Edward Faught, Pavel Klein, Markus Reuber, Felix Rosenow, Javier Salas-Puig, Victor Soto Insuga, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Adam Strzelczyk, Dimitrios Bourikas, Tony Daniels, Florin Floricel, David Friesen, Cédric Laloyaux, Vicente Villanueva
来源: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY

摘要:

通过特定合并症和癫痫病因来评估布瓦西坦 (BRV) 对成人癫痫患者的有效性和耐受性。EXPERIENCE/EPD332 是对临床实践中癫痫患者启动 BRV 的几项非干预性研究中的个体患者记录的汇总分析。结果包括癫痫发作频率较基线降低 50%、无癫痫发作(前 3 个月内无癫痫发作)、持续无癫痫发作(自基线后无癫痫发作)、BRV 停药以及治疗后第 3、6、6 小时出现的不良事件 (TEAE)和 12 个月。对所有成年患者(≥16 岁)进行分析,并按基线时的合并症和病因进行分层(患有认知/学习障碍 [CLD]、精神合并症、中风后癫痫、脑肿瘤相关癫痫 [BTRE] 的患者)和创伤性脑损伤相关癫痫 [TBIE])。12 个月时,癫痫发作减少了 35.6% (n = 264)、38.7% (n = 310)、41.7% (n = 24)、34.1患有 CLD、精神共病、中风后癫痫、BTRE 和 TBIE 的患者分别占 % (n = 41) 和 50.0% (n = 28);持续无癫痫发作的比例分别为 5.7% (n = 318)、13.7% (n = 424)、29.4% (n = 34)、11.4% (n = 44) 和 13.8% (n = 29)。在研究随访期间,患有 CLD、精神共病、中风后癫痫、BTRE 和 TBIE 的患者中,分别为 37.1% (n = 403)、30.7% (n = 605)、33.3% (n = 51)、39.7分别有 % (n = 68) 和 27.1% (n = 49) 的患者停止 BRV;自上次就诊以来 12 个月内发生 TEAE 的比例分别为 11.3% (n = 283)、10.0% (n = 410)、16.7% (n = 36)、12.5% (n = 48) 和 3.0% (n = 33) ),分别。在现实世界中,BRV 在患有 CLD、精神共病、中风后癫痫、BTRE 和 TBIE 的患者中是有效且耐受性良好的。© 2024。作者。
To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with epilepsy by specific comorbidities and epilepsy etiologies.EXPERIENCE/EPD332 was a pooled analysis of individual patient records from several non-interventional studies of patients with epilepsy initiating BRV in clinical practice. Outcomes included ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency, seizure freedom (no seizures within prior 3 months), continuous seizure freedom (no seizures since baseline), BRV discontinuation, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Analyses were performed for all adult patients (≥ 16 years of age) and stratified by comorbidity and by etiology at baseline (patients with cognitive/learning disability [CLD], psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy [BTRE], and traumatic brain injury-related epilepsy [TBIE]).At 12 months, ≥ 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 35.6% (n = 264), 38.7% (n = 310), 41.7% (n = 24), 34.1% (n = 41), and 50.0% (n = 28) of patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, respectively; and continuous seizure freedom was achieved in 5.7% (n = 318), 13.7% (n = 424), 29.4% (n = 34), 11.4% (n = 44), and 13.8% (n = 29), respectively. During the study follow-up, in patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, 37.1% (n = 403), 30.7% (n = 605), 33.3% (n = 51), 39.7% (n = 68), and 27.1% (n = 49) of patients discontinued BRV, respectively; and TEAEs since prior visit at 12 months were reported in 11.3% (n = 283), 10.0% (n = 410), 16.7% (n = 36), 12.5% (n = 48), and 3.0% (n = 33), respectively.BRV as prescribed in the real world is effective and well tolerated among patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE.© 2024. The Author(s).