研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

比较匹配和不匹配的无关同种异体造血干细胞移植与不同抗胸腺细胞球蛋白制剂的结果:代表波兰成人白血病组的回顾性双中心经验。

Comparing the Outcomes of Matched and Mismatched Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Different Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Formulations: A Retrospective, Double-Centre Experience on Behalf of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group.

发表日期:2024 May 16
作者: Ugo Giordano, Monika Mordak-Domagała, Małgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka, Sebastian Giebel, Lidia Gil, Krzysztof D Dudek, Jarosław Dybko
来源: Stem Cell Research & Therapy

摘要:

尽管过去几十年免疫疗法取得了显着进展,但同种异体造血干细胞移植(allo-HCT)仍然是一种有前途的、具有潜在治愈性的治疗方式。只有少数研究对两种流行的兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白 (r-ATG) 制剂进行了直接比较,特别是胸腺球蛋白(ATG-T,以前称为 Genzyme)和 Grafalon(ATG-G,以前称为费森尤斯)。我们回顾性分析的主要目的是比较接受匹配或不匹配无关供者 (MUD/MMUD) 同种异体 HCT 的成年患者与基于 ATG-T 或 ATG 的移植物抗宿主病 (GvHD) 预防的结果-G。总共纳入了 87 名 2012 年至 2022 年间接受过异基因 HCT 的患者。我们观察到 ATG-T 和 ATG-G 在急性移植物抗宿主病 (aGvHD) 的发生方面没有显着差异,无论其严重程度如何。相反,与 ATG-G 组相比,ATG-T 组的慢性移植物抗宿主病 (cGvHD) 发生率较低(7.5% vs. 38.3%,p = 0.001)。多变量分析证实了 ATG-G 对 cGvHD 的负面影响(HR 8.12,95% CI 2.06-32.0,p = 0.003)。使用 ATG-T 治疗的患者表现出巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 再激活的发生率较高(70% vs. 31.9%,p < 0.001),移植和 CMV 之间的时间较短(<61 天,77.8% vs. 33.3%,p = 0.008)和更高的 CMV 拷贝数中位数(1000 vs. 0,p = 0.004)。值得注意的是,尽管 ATG-T 队列中 CMV 再激活的发生率较高,但与 ATG-G 相比,大多数患者没有症状(85.7% vs. 43.8%,p = 0.005)。通过多变量分析,只有 aGvHD 对 CMV 再激活有影响(HR 0.18,95% CI 0.04-0.75,p = 0.019)。最后,在比较 ATG-T 和 ATG-G 时,我们观察到 5 年总生存率 (OS) 和 3 年无复发生存率 (RFS) 没有显着差异(32.0% 与 40.3%,p = 0.423; 66.7% 与 60.4%,分别为 p = 0.544)。
Despite notable advancements in immunotherapy in the past decades, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a promising, potentially curative treatment modality. Only a limited number of studies have performed a direct comparison of two prevalent rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) formulations-specifically, Thymoglobuline (ATG-T, formerly Genzyme) and Grafalon (ATG-G, formerly Fresenius). The primary objective of our retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of adult patients undergoing matched or mismatched unrelated donor (MUD/MMUD) allo-HCT, with a graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis based on either ATG-T or ATG-G. A total of 87 patients who had undergone allo-HCT between 2012 and 2022 were included. We observed no significant differences between ATG-T and ATG-G concerning the occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), regardless of its severity. Conversely, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) occurred less frequently in the ATG-T group compared to the ATG-G group (7.5% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.001). The negative impact of ATG-G on cGvHD was confirmed by multivariate analysis (HR 8.12, 95% CI 2.06-32.0, p = 0.003). Patients treated with ATG-T manifested a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations (70% vs. 31.9%, p < 0.001), with a shorter time between transplant and CMV (<61 days, 77.8% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.008) and a higher median CMV copy number (1000 vs. 0, p = 0.004). Notably, despite a higher occurrence of CMV reactivations in the ATG-T cohort, most patients were asymptomatic compared to ATG-G (85.7% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.005). By multivariate analysis, only aGvHD had an influence on CMV reactivations (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.75, p = 0.019). Finally, we observed no significant differences in terms of 5-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) while comparing ATG-T and ATG-G (32.0% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.423; 66.7% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.544, respectively).