霍奇金淋巴瘤 HLA 匹配移植中 PTCy 与基于 CNI 的 GVHD 预防:EBMT LWP 的研究。
PTCy versus CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants for Hodgkin Lymphoma: a study of the LWP of the EBMT.
发表日期:2024 May 29
作者:
Juan Montoro, Maud Ngoya, Alexander Kulagin, Sebastian Giebel, Annoek E C Broers, Stefania Bramanti, Khalid Halahleh, Jose Antonio Perez-Simon, Carlos Solano, Tulay Ozcelik, Didier Blaise, Jaime Sanz, Marta Henriques, Régis Peffault de Latour, Rodrigo Martino, Christof Scheid, Laura Fox, Tomasz Gromek, Manuel Jurado, Ioanna Sakellari, Gwendolyn van Gorkom, Paola Matteucci, Arnon Nagler, Yener Koc, Bertram Glass
来源:
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
摘要:
在霍奇金淋巴瘤 (HL) 患者中,比较移植后环磷酰胺 (PTCy) 与传统的基于钙调磷酸酶抑制剂 (CNI) 的 GVHD 预防方案的疗效的研究很少。本研究旨在使用 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间向 EBMT 数据库报告的数据,比较接受来自 HLA 匹配供体的造血干细胞移植的 HL 患者的结果,这些患者接受了基于 PTCy 或传统 CNI 方案的 GVHD 预防。在该队列中,270 名接受者接受了基于 CNI 的传统预防,176 名接受者接受了 PTCy 预防。值得注意的是,与基于 CNI 的预防相比,PTCy 预防与造血恢复延迟相关,但也具有较低的慢性 GVHD 风险(25% 与 43%,p<0.001)和广泛慢性 GVHD(13% 与 28%,p=0.003)。队列。基于 PTCy 和 CNI 的 2 年累积非复发死亡率和复发发生率分别为 11% 和 17% (p=0.12) 以及 17% 和 30% (p=0.007)。此外,与基于 CNI 的组相比,PTCy 组的 2 年总生存率、无进展生存率和无 GVHD、无复发生存率均显着更好:85% 对比 72% (p=0.005),72分别为 % 与 53% (p<0.001) 和 59% 与 31% (p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,与基于 CNI 的平台相比,PTCy 与较低的慢性和广泛慢性 GVHD 风险、减少的复发以及更好的 OS、PFS 和 GRFS 相关。我们的研究结果表明,对于接受 HLA 匹配供体的 HSCT 的成年 HL 患者,与传统的基于 CNI 的预防相比,PTCy 作为 GVHD 预防可提供更有利的结果。版权所有 © 2024 美国血液学会。
Studies comparing the efficacy of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based GVHD prophylaxis regimens in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are scarce. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of HL patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched donors who received GVHD prophylaxis with either PTCy or conventional CNI-based regimens, using data reported to the EBMT database between January 2015 and December 2022. Among the cohort, 270 recipients received conventional CNI-based prophylaxis and 176 received PTCy prophylaxis. Notably, PTCy prophylaxis was associated with delayed hematopoietic recovery, but also with a lower risk of chronic (25% versus 43%, p<0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (13% versus 28% p=0.003) compared to the CNI-based cohort. The 2-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 11% versus 17% (p=0.12), and 17% versus 30% (p=0.007) for PTCy and CNI-based, respectively. Moreover, the 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were all significantly better in the PTCy group compared with the CNI-based group: 85% versus 72% (p=0.005), 72% versus 53% (p<0.001), and 59% versus 31% (p<0.001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, PTCy was associated with a lower risk of chronic and extensive chronic GVHD, reduced relapse, and better OS, PFS, and GRFS compared to the CNI-based platform. Our findings suggest that PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis offers more favorable outcomes compared to conventional CNI-based prophylaxis in adult patients with HL undergoing HSCT from HLA-matched donors.Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.