ARH评分是肝细胞癌患者肝动脉灌注化疗再治疗决策的实用指南。
The ARH score, a practical guide to decision-making for retreatment with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
发表日期:2024 Jun 30
作者:
Jie Mei, Chengyou Yu, Feng Shi, Renguo Guan, Shaohua Li, Chong Zhong, Rongping Guo, Wei Wei
来源:
INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
摘要:
肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)是治疗不可切除的大型肝细胞癌(HCC)的一种有前景的选择。确定可以从持续 HAIC 中受益的患者仍然是一个挑战。我们的目的是建立一个客观的模型来指导HAIC再治疗的决策。2015年至2020年间,检索了来自3个不同中心的接受多个HAIC周期的无大血管侵犯或肝外扩散的大型不可切除HCC患者的数据。我们研究了基本的肿瘤参数以及 HAIC 对肝功能和肿瘤反应的影响,以及它们对总生存期 (OS) 的影响。评分(ARH,HAIC 再治疗评估)是通过在训练队列 (n = 112) 中使用逐步 Cox 回归模型建立的,并在独立验证队列 (n = 71) 中进行验证。之前的高甲胎蛋白HAIC 的第二个周期、Child-Pugh 评分的增加和不良的放射学肿瘤反应仍然是独立的负面预后因素,并用于创建 ARH 评分。随着ARH评分的升高,HCC患者的预后明显恶化。 ARH评分0-2分和≥2.5分患者的中位OS分别为19.37个月和11.60个月(P < 0.001)。所有这些结果均已在外部验证队列中得到证实,并在多个亚组中显示出显着性。ARH 评分可以很好地预测接受 HAIC 复治的 HCC 患者的预后。在第二轮 HAIC 之前 ARH 评分≥2.5 的患者可能无法从进一步的治疗中获益。版权所有 © 2024。由 Elsevier B.V. 出版。
Hepatic arterial infusionchemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising option for large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identifying patients who could benefit from continuous HAIC remains a challenge. We aimed to establish an objective model to guide the decision for retreatment with HAIC.Between 2015 and 2020, the data of patients with large unresectable HCC without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread undergoing multiple HAIC cycles from 3 different centers were retrieved. We investigated the basic tumor parameters and the effect of HAIC on liver function and tumor response, and their impact on overall survival (OS). A point score (ARH, Assessment for Retreatment with HAIC) was built by using a stepwise Cox regression model in the training cohort (n = 112) and was validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 71).The high α-fetoprotein before the second cycle of HAIC, an increase in Child-Pugh score, and undesirable radiologic tumor responses remained independent negative prognostic factors and were used to create the ARH score. The prognosis of HCC patients deteriorated significantly with the increase in ARH score. The median OS of patients with ARH score 0-2 points and ≥ 2.5 points were 19.37 months and 11.60 months (P < 0.001). All of these results had been confirmed in the external validation cohort and demonstrated significance across multiple subgroups.The ARH score makes an excellent prediction of the prognosis of HCC patients who received retreatment of HAIC. Patients with an ARH score ≥ 2.5 prior to the second cycle of HAIC may not profit from further sessions.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.