边缘状态对新辅助化疗后接受保乳手术的乳腺癌患者局部复发的影响:一项回顾性多机构队列研究。
Impact of Margin Status on Local Recurrence in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.
发表日期:2024 Jul 05
作者:
Élise Di Lena, Ericka Iny, Stephanie M Wong, Miranda Bassel, Arusa Shah, Mark Basik, Jean-François Boileau, Karyne Martel, Sarkis Meterissian, Ipshita Prakash
来源:
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
摘要:
有人提出 NAC 后保乳手术 (BCS) 局部复发风险增加的问题,凸显了该患者群体中最佳切缘宽度的不确定性。我们研究了 NAC 之后接受 BCS 的患者切缘状态与局部无复发生存 (LRFS) 之间的关联。我们对 2012 年至 2012 年期间接受 NAC 后接受 BCS 的 I-III 期乳腺癌成年女性患者进行了回顾性队列研究。 2021 年在两个癌症中心。如果切缘 < 1 毫米,则被归类为“接近”。完整队列包括 544 名患者,中位年龄为 53 岁(四分位距 [IQR] 44-64)。整个队列中 41.2% 的人实现了病理完全缓解 (pCR) (n = 224)。在 320 例有残留病灶的患者中,29.4% (n = 94) 具有至少 1 个闭合边缘,10.9% (n = 35) 具有 ≥2 个闭合边缘。中位随访时间为 55 个月(IQR 32-83); 4.8% 的患者出现同侧乳房复发 (n = 26)。 pCR 患者的 5 年 LRFS 高于残留病患者(98.0% vs. 91.6%,p = 0.02)。对于有残留病灶的患者,不同切缘类别(清晰 vs. 1 个闭合切缘 vs. ≥2 个闭合切缘)的 5 年 LRFS 没有差异(92.2% vs. 88.9% vs. 92.9%)(p = 0.78)。在 NAC 后接受 BCS 的患者中,与手术时有残留病灶的患者相比,实现 pCR 的患者的 LRFS 显着较高,但 LRFS 与切缘宽度或紧密切缘数量无关。© 2024。Society of Surgical肿瘤学。
Questions have been raised as to an increased risk of local recurrence with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) post NAC highlighting the uncertainty around optimal margin width in this patient population. We examined the association between margin status and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients who underwent BCS following NAC.We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult female patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by BCS between 2012 and 2021 at two cancer centers. Margins were categorized as "close" if they were < 1 mm.The full cohort included 544 patients with a median age of 53 years (interquartile range [IQR] 44-64). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 41.2% of the overall cohort (n = 224). Of the 320 with residual disease, 29.4% (n = 94) had at least one close margin, and 10.9% (n = 35) had ≥2 close margins. Median follow-up was 55 months (IQR 32-83); 4.8% had an ipsilateral breast recurrence (n = 26). Patients with pCR had a higher 5-year LRFS than those with residual disease (98.0% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in 5-year LRFS between the margin categories (clear vs. 1 close margin vs. ≥2 close margins) in those with residual disease (92.2% vs. 88.9% vs. 92.9%) (p = 0.78).In patients undergoing BCS post-NAC, those who achieved pCR had a significantly higher LRFS compared with those with residual disease at the time of surgery, but LRFS was not associated with margin width nor the number of close margins.© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.