纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗联合治疗未经治疗、不可切除的胸膜间皮瘤的真实世界疗效和安全性:中观免疫 (GFPC 04-2021) 试验。
Real-World efficacy and safety of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab for Untreated, Unresectable, pleural Mesothelioma: The Meso-Immune (GFPC 04-2021) trial.
发表日期:2024 Jun 29
作者:
Olivier Bylicki, Florian Guisier, Arnaud Scherpereel, Catherine Daniel, Aurélie Swalduz, Emmanuel Grolleau, Marie Bernardi, Stephane Hominal, Jean Briac Prevost, Guillaume Pamart, Marie Héléne Marques, Nicolas Cloarec, Simon Deshayes, Judith Raimbourg, Rémi Veillon, Youssef Oulkhouir, Clarisse Audigier Valette, Fabien Subtil, Christos Chouaïd, Laurent Greillier,
来源:
LUNG CANCER
摘要:
不可切除的胸膜间皮瘤 (PM) 的一线护理标准随 3 期 CheckMate 743 研究结果的变化而变化,显示纳武单抗加伊匹单抗 (Nivo Ipi) 与铂类培美曲塞化疗相比,可显着延长 PM 的总生存期 (OS)(中位OS 18.1 个月与 14.1 个月;风险比:0.74;p = 0.002)。需要真实世界 (rw) 环境中的疗效和安全性数据来确认这些结果。这项法国多中心回顾性队列研究旨在评估通过早期访问计划 (EAP) 接受 Nivo Ipi 的初治 PM 患者的结果。主要目标是研究者评估的现实世界无进展生存期(PFS)。次要目标是该组合的总生存期 (OS) 和安全性。从 2021 年 4 月 1 日到 2022 年 2 月 15 日,该分析纳入了 63 个中心接受治疗的 305 名 EAP 患者中的 201 名(79.6% 为男性;中位年龄:75 岁; 91.8% 东部肿瘤合作组表现状态 (ECOG-PS) 0/1;74.5% 上皮样组织学)。所有患者的中位随访时间 (95% CI) 为 18.4 (17.7-19.2) 个月,PFS 和 OS 分别为 6.3 (5.3-7.5) 和 18.9 (17.6-未达到 (NR)) 个月,1 年操作系统为 66.4% (60.1-73.3%)。上皮样和非上皮样的中位 OS 和 1 年生存率为 21.0 (18.7-NR) 和 70.8% (63.9%-780.6%),14.1 (10.9-21.0) 个月和 54.9% (42.8%-70.4%)分别为 PM 子组。两个亚组之间的 PFS 相等。 23.3% 的患者发生 3-4 级不良事件,三例死亡与治疗相关。对于这个未经选择的 PM 人群,疗效和安全性结果与 CheckMate 743 试验结果相比更为有利。版权所有 © 2024 作者。由 Elsevier B.V. 出版。保留所有权利。
First-line standard-of-care for unresectable, pleural mesothelioma (PM) changed with the phase 3 CheckMate 743 study results, showing that nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo + Ipi) significantly extended overall survival (OS) versus platinum + pemetrexed chemotherapy for PM (median OS 18.1 versus 14.1 months; hazard ratio: 0.74; p = 0.002). Efficacy and safety data in real-world (rw) settings are needed to confirm these results.This French multicenter, retrospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the outcomes of treatment-naïve PM patients given Nivo + Ipi via an early-access program (EAP). The primary objective was investigator-assessed real world -progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary objectives were the combination's -overall survival (OS) and safety.From 1 April 2021 to 15 Feb 2022, the analysis included 201 of the 305 EAP-enrolled patients treated in 63 centers (79.6 % men; median age: 75 years; 91.8 % Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0/1; 74.5 % epithelioid histology). With median (95 % CI) follow-up for all patients of 18.4 (17.7-19.2) months, -PFS and OS were 6.3 (5.3-7.5) and 18.9 (17.6-not reached (NR)) months, with 1-year OS at 66.4 % (60.1-73.3 %). Median OS and 1-year survival rates were 21.0 (18.7-NR) and 70.8 % (63.9 %-780.6 %), and 14.1 (10.9-21.0) months and 54.9 % (42.8 %-70.4 %) for epithelioid and non-epithelioid PM subgroups, respectively. PFS was equal between the two subgroups. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 23.3 % of patients and three deaths were treatment-related.For this unselected PM population, efficacy and safety outcomes compared favorably with CheckMate 743 trial results.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.