研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

TERT 启动子突变 C228T 和 C250T 对甲状腺乳头状癌的独特转录和预后影响。

Distinct transcriptional and prognostic impacts of TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

发表日期:2024 Jul 01
作者: Vicente Rodrigues Marczyk, Ana Luiza Maia, Iuri Martin Goemann
来源: ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER

摘要:

TERT 启动子突变 C228T 和 C250T 与甲状腺乳头状癌患者的疾病侵袭性和不良临床结果相关。然而,人们对这些突变的转录后果以及它们是否都具有相似的致癌潜力知之甚少。在这里,我们使用来自癌症基因组图谱的数据描述了与这两种突变的存在相关的转录紊乱和临床结果。我们观察到,携带 C228T 突变的肿瘤 (n=27) 的 TERT mRNA 水平增加了 16 倍 (P=5.3x10-42),而 C250T 肿瘤 (n=8) 的表达仅增加了 2 倍( P=0.034)。 C228T 突变与控制细胞周期、细胞分裂和细胞外基质降解的信号通路的激活有关。单变量分析表明,C228T 突变与诊断时年龄较大、肿瘤体积较大、淋巴结侵犯和诊断时远处转移有关。与 WT 肿瘤相比,C228T 突变还与更差的无进展间期 (PFI) 相关(HR=5.04;P<0.001)。在调整 BRAF-V600E 状态和 ATA 风险组的多变量分析(HR=3.74,P=0.003)中,这种关联仍然显着。我们的数据表明,TERT 启动子突变 C228T 和 C250T 在 PTC 中具有不同的转录后果,表明 C228T 突变具有更大的致癌潜力。 TERT 启动子突变 C228T 可能是识别远处复发高风险患者的有用预后标志物。 C250T 突变的临床数据仍然有限,迄今为止没有证据证实其预后意义。
TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T are associated with disease aggressiveness and poor clinical outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinomas. However, very little is known about the transcriptional consequences of these mutations and whether they both carry similar oncogenic potential. Here we characterized the transcriptional disturbances and clinical outcomes associated with the presence of each of these two mutations using data derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We observed that tumors harboring the C228T mutation (n=27) exhibited a 16-fold increase in TERT mRNA levels (P=5.3x10-42), whereas C250T tumors (n=8) showed only a 2-fold increase in expression (P=0.034). The C228T mutation was associated with the activation of signaling pathways controlling the cell cycle, cellular division, and extracellular matrix degradation. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the C228T mutation was associated with older age at diagnosis, large tumor size, lymph node invasion, and distant metastases at diagnosis. The C228T mutation was also associated with worse progression-free interval (PFI) in comparison to WT tumors (HR=5,04; P<0.001). This association remained significant in a multivariate analyses (HR=3.74, P=0.003) adjusting for BRAF-V600E status and ATA risk group. Our data indicate that TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T have distinct transcriptional consequences in PTC, suggesting a greater oncogenic potential for the C228T mutation. TERT promoter mutation C228T may be a useful prognostic marker to identify patients at high risk of distant recurrence. Clinical data for the C250T mutation is still limited, with no evidence up to date to confirm its prognostic significance.