通过全身给药克服胰腺癌瘤内注射 STING 激动剂的挑战。
Overcome the challenge for intratumoral injection of STING agonist for pancreatic cancer by systemic administration.
发表日期:2024 Aug 07
作者:
Keyu Li, Junke Wang, Rui Zhang, Jiawei Zhou, Birginia Espinoza, Nan Niu, Jianxin Wang, Noelle Jurcak, Noah Rozich, Arsen Osipov, MacKenzie Henderson, Vanessa Funes, Melissa Lyman, Alex B Blair, Brian Herbst, Mengni He, Jialong Yuan, Diego Trafton, Chunhui Yuan, Michael Wichroski, Xubao Liu, Juan Fu, Lei Zheng
来源:
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
摘要:
由于瘤内给药的挑战,先天性激动剂尚未超越大多数肿瘤类型功效测试的临床前研究。胰腺导管腺癌 (PDAC) 具有不利的肿瘤微环境,导致 T 细胞功能障碍。先天激动剂治疗可作为 T 细胞启动机制,使 PDAC 对抗 PD-1 抗体 (a-PD-1) 治疗敏感。使用自发形成肝转移的移植小鼠模型、自发形成 PDAC 的基因工程 KPC 小鼠模型和人类患者衍生的异种移植模型,我们比较了 BMS-986301 的肝内/肿瘤内和肌肉内全身给药之间的抗肿瘤功效。下一代 STING 激动剂。流式细胞术、纳米线和细胞因子测定用于评估局部和全身免疫反应。这项研究表明,通过肌肉注射全身注射 STING 激动剂在诱导效应 T 细胞反应和抗肿瘤功效方面与瘤内注射相当。与瘤内给药相比,全身给药诱导的 T 细胞耗竭和免疫抑制信号减弱。尽管如此,STING 激动剂的瘤内治疗或全身治疗均与肿瘤浸润 T 细胞上 CTLA-4 表达增加相关。然而,a-PD-1 和抗 CTLA-4 抗体与全身 STING 激动剂的组合在 KPC 小鼠自发性 PDAC 模型中证明了抗肿瘤功效。用 PBMC 重建人类患者来源的异种移植物的小鼠胰腺和肝脏原位模型也表明,肿瘤内和肌肉内 STING 激动剂的抗肿瘤和远隔作用是相同的。总而言之,本研究支持通过全身给药治疗 PDAC 的先天激动剂的临床开发。© 2024。作者。
Due to the challenge for intratumoral administration, innate agonists have not made it beyond preclinical studies for efficacy testing in most tumor types. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a hostile tumor microenvironment that renders T cells dysfunctional. Innate agonist treatments may serve as a T cell priming mechanism to sensitize PDACs to anti-PD-1 antibody (a-PD-1) treatment. Using a transplant mouse model with spontaneously formed liver metastasis, a genetically engineered KPC mouse model that spontaneously develops PDAC, and a human patient-derived xenograft model, we compared the antitumor efficacy between intrahepatic/intratumoral and intramuscular systemic administration of BMS-986301, a next-generation STING agonist. Flow cytometry, Nanostring, and cytokine assays were used to evaluate local and systemic immune responses. This study demonstrated that administration of STING agonist systemically via intramuscular injection is equivalent to its intratumoral injection in inducing both effector T cell response and antitumor efficacy. Compared to intratumoral administration, T cell exhaustion and immunosuppressive signals induced by systemic administration were attenuated. Nonetheless, either intratumoral or systemic treatment of STING agonist was associated with increased expression of CTLA-4 on tumor-infiltrating T cells. However, the combination of a-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody with systemic STING agonist demonstrated the antitumor efficacy in the KPC mouse spontaneous PDAC model. The mouse pancreatic and liver orthotopic model of human patient-derived xenograft reconstituted with PBMC also showed that antitumor and abscopal effects of both intratumoral and intramuscular STING agonist are equivalent. Taken together, this study supports the clinical development of innate agonists via systemic administration for treating PDAC.© 2024. The Author(s).