三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化学免疫治疗期间的密集剂量与每周 3 周的 AC。
Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.
发表日期:2024 Aug 14
作者:
Renata Colombo Bonadio, Isadora Martins de Sousa, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Ana Carolina Marin Comini, Monique Celeste Tavares, Fernanda Madasi, Jose Bines, Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Candice Lima Santos, Zenaide Silva de Souza, Daniele Assad-Suzuki, Júlio Antônio Pereira de Araújo, Débora de Melo Gagliato, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, Bruna M Zucchetti, Anezka Ferrari, Mayana Lopes de Brito, Renata Cangussu, Maria Marcela Fernandes Monteiro, Paulo M Hoff, Laura Testa, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa
来源:
npj Breast Cancer
摘要:
新辅助派姆单抗联合化疗 (P CT) 已成为 II-III 期三阴性乳腺癌 (TNBC) 的标准治疗方法。然而,最佳的蒽环类-环磷酰胺 (AC) 方案仍有待确定。虽然 KEYNOTE-522 方案每 3 周使用一次 AC (q3w AC),但之前的研究表明剂量密集方案对早期乳腺癌具有总体生存获益。 Neo-Real 研究 (GBECAM-0123) 是一项真实世界数据工作,评估自 2020 年 7 月以来在十个癌症中心接受新辅助 P CT 治疗的 TNBC 患者。该分析的目的是评估剂量密集治疗的有效性和安全性AC (ddAC) 与 q3w AC。截至 2023 年 11 月,在纳入的 333 名患者中,311 名患者完成了新辅助治疗,279 名患者接受了手术并提供了病理报告; 58.2% 的病例使用了 ddAC,41.8% 的病例使用了 q3w AC。大多数患者(69.1%)患有 II 期 TNBC。 ddAC 的 pCR 率为 65.4%,q3w AC 的 pCR 率为 58.7%(P = 0.260),而 RCB 0-1 的发生率分别为 82.4% 和 73.5%(P = 0.115)。 III 期疾病患者使用 ddAC 后的 pCR 数值较高(59% vs 40%,P = 0.155),而无论 II 期疾病采用何种 AC 方案,pCR 率均相似(66.6% vs 64.5%;P = 0.760)。虽然停药方面没有显着差异,但 ddAC 显示 ≥3 级 AE 发生率较高的趋势(40.5% 对比 30.7%,P = 0.092)。 Neo-Real 研究不能排除新辅助 P CT 期间 ddAC 和 q3w AC 之间的差异。在 III 期疾病中观察到 ddAC 可能具有更高的 pCR,值得进一步研究。© 2024。作者。
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.© 2024. The Author(s).