该观点的目的是提供有关在健康促进中使用人工智能（AI）的建议。为了得出这些建议，我们遵循了 6 个步骤。第一步是从流行病事件保护健康生活 (HL-PIVOT) 网络招募国际作者团队。这使我们能够获得来自加拿大、英国、肯尼亚、意大利和美国的见解的国际视野。针对 5 个问题进行了哲学探究。在健康促进方面，人类与人工智能应该是什么关系？公众和专业人士如何信任人工智能？我们如何确保人工智能符合我们的价值观？我们如何确保人工智能以合乎道德的方式使用数据？我们如何控制人工智能？还开发了 4 个假设情景，以提供以下观点： i) 人工智能“与”人类智能； ii) 人工智能在自我护理方面的赋能； iii) 人工智能能否改善患者提供者关系； iii) 处于流行高峰期的肯尼亚癌症患者。基于哲学探究和情景，HL-PIVOT 就人工智能在健康促进中的应用提出了 11 条建议。贯穿这些建议的金线是以人为本的方法。这些建议首先建议劳动力规划应考虑人工智能。他们最后声明，任何涉及人工智能健康促进的严重事件都应向相关监管机构报告。版权所有 © 2024。由 Elsevier Inc. 出版。

The purpose of this perspective is to provide recommendations on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health promotion. To arrive at these recommendations, we followed a 6-step process. The first step was to recruit an international authorship team from the Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL- PIVOT) network. This enabled us to achieve an international perspective with insights from Canada, Great Britain, Kenya, Italy, and the US. A philosophical inquiry was conducted addressing 5 questions. What should the relationship be between humans and AI in health promotion? How can the public and professionals trust AI? How can we ensure AI is aligned with our values? How can we ensure the ethical use of data by AI? How can we control AI? 4 hypothetical scenarios were also developed to provide perspectives on: i) Artificial 'Versus' Human Intelligence; ii) AI Empowerment in Self-Care; iii) Could AI Improve Patient Provider Relationship; and iii) The Kenyan Cancer Patient at the Height of a Pandemic. Based on the philosophical inquiry and the scenarios 11 recommendations are made by the HL-PIVOT on the use of AI in health promotion. The golden thread running through these recommendations is a human centric approach. The recommendations begin by suggesting that workforce planning should take account of AI. They conclude with the statement that any serious incidents involving an AI in Health Promotion should be reported to the relevant regulatory authority.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.