胰头十二指肠切除术后胰腺导管腺癌患者延迟胃排空的风险分层:一项国际验证队列研究
Delayed gastric emptying risk stratification in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy: An international validation cohort study
DOI 原文链接
用sci-hub下载
如无法下载,请从 Sci-Hub 选择可用站点尝试。
影响因子:6.7
分区:医学2区 / 胃肠肝病学3区
发表日期:2025 May
作者:
Zongting Gu, Yongxing Du, Yunjie Duan, Xiaohao Zheng, Chengfeng Wang, Jianwei Zhang
DOI:
10.1002/ueg2.12688
摘要
目前,尚缺乏一种准确预测胰头十二指肠切除术(PD)后胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者延迟胃排空(DGE)风险的模型。本研究旨在开发一种简明有效的模型以预测DGE风险。本回顾性队列研究纳入了美国多中心ACS-NSQIP数据库中接受PD的1251例连续PDAC患者的训练队列。此外,还纳入了来自中国国家癌症中心的934例接受PD的连续PDAC患者的验证队列。分析中共纳入了46个围手术期指标。利用Lasso-logistic回归方法开发并验证了DGE风险分层(DGERS)模型。通过Lasso-logistic筛选,确定了与DGE显著相关的四个独立预测因素:胰腺引流管拔除的天数(HR,1.05;95% CI,1.02-1.08;p < 0.001)、胰腺瘘(HR,2.61;95% CI,1.65-4.12;p < 0.001)、败血症/感染性休克(HR,2.46;95% CI,1.52-3.91;p < 0.001)以及再手术(HR,4.16;95% CI,2.27-7.57;p < 0.001)。基于这些因素,我们开发了一个预测术后DGE的列线图。该模型在验证队列中表现出良好的校准性和优异的性能(AUC,0.73;95% CI,0.67-0.73)。在验证队列中,DGERS显示出显著的风险分层能力,低、中、高风险组的AUC值分别为0.7、0.61和0.74。本研究识别出四个独立增加PD后PDAC患者DGE发生风险的因素,包括胰腺引流管拔除天数、胰腺瘘、败血症/感染性休克和再手术。基于这些发现,我们开发了一种个性化且简便的DGERS,能够动态、精准地预测DGE风险,从而有效进行个体风险分层。
Abstract
Currently, there is still a lack of an accurate predictive model for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to develop a concise model that could effectively predict the risk of DGE.This retrospective cohort study included a training cohort of 1251 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent PD from the US multicenter ACS-NSQIP database. Additionally, a validation cohort of 934 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent PD was included from the National Cancer Center in China. A total of 46 perioperative indicators were incorporated in the analysis. The DGE risk stratification (DGERS) model was then developed and validated using Lasso-logistic regression.After screening using Lasso-logistic regression, we identified four independent predictors that were significantly correlated with DGE: days to pancreatic drain removal (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; p < 0.001), pancreatic fistula (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.65-4.12; p < 0.001), sepsis/septic shock (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.52-3.91; p < 0.001), and reoperation (HR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.27-7.57; p < 0.001). Based on these factors, we developed a nomogram to predict postoperative DGE. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and optimal performance in the validation cohorts (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.73). In the validation cohort, the DGERS exhibited significant risk stratification ability, with AUC values of 0.7, 0.61, and 0.74 for the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively.This study identified four factors that independently increased the occurrence of DGE in patients with PDAC after PD, including days to pancreatic drain removal, pancreatic fistula, sepsis/septic shock, and reoperation. Based on these findings, we developed a personalized and straightforward DGERS that enables dynamic and precise prediction of DGE risk, allowing for effective stratification of individuals based on their risk profiles.